Skip to main content
· 8/27/2009

United States v. Shabaz

Citations

  • 579 F.3d 815
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19315
  • 2009 WL 2616151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the statements, “maybe I should talk to a lawyer” and “I don’t know if I need an attorney,” do not invoke the right to counsel
  • explaining that the ultimate con- clusion of whether a Miranda waiver was knowing and volun- tary is reviewed de novo, but the district court’s findings of fact and credibility determinations are reviewed for clear error
  • explaining that the ultimate con- clusion of whether a Miranda waiver was knowing and volun- tary is reviewed de novo, but the district court’s findings of fact and credibility determinations are reviewed for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Wood, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.