Skip to main content
· 9/8/1994

United States v. H. Jay Mummert

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 201
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24280
  • 1994 WL 482602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating and remanding because the record did not make clear whether the district court’s denial of departure was based on legal or discretionary grounds
  • vacating sentence and remanding to district court because \the record does not make clear whether the district court's denial of departure was based on legal or discretionary grounds\
  • upholding face value of loan as reasonable calculation of bank's actual loss where no assets had been pledged against the loan and no payments had been made thereon
  • refusing to reduce amount of loss caused by fraud notwithstanding fact that co-participant in crime offered 32 No. 01-4084 to make gratuitous transfer of property which was basis of loan transaction
  • “A defendant in a fraud case should not be able to reduce the amount of loss for sentencing purposes by offering to make restitution after being caught.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Alito, Brody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.