Skip to main content
· 8/23/1995

United States v. Michael C. Coyle

Citations

  • 63 F.3d 1239
  • 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1888
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23933
  • 1995 WL 498982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Court will \consider the totality of the instructions and not a particular sentence or paragraph in isolation\
  • noting that the Court will “consider the totality of the instructions and not a particular sentence or paragraph in isolation”
  • noting that the Court will “consider the totality of the instructions and not a particular sentence or paragraph in isolation”
  • explaining that a conviction under 18 U.S.C.S 1027 requires a showing that (1) the defendant made a false statement; (2) knowing it to be false; (3) in a document required by ERISA
  • “The negligence of the victim in failing to discover a fraudulent scheme is not a defense to criminal conduct.”
  • \The negligence of the victim in failing to discover a fraudulent scheme is not a defense to criminal conduct.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Scirica, Ambrose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.