· 8/23/1995
United States v. Michael C. Coyle
Citations
- 63 F.3d 1239
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1888
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23933
- 1995 WL 498982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Court will \consider the totality of the instructions and not a particular sentence or paragraph in isolation\
- noting that the Court will “consider the totality of the instructions and not a particular sentence or paragraph in isolation”
- noting that the Court will “consider the totality of the instructions and not a particular sentence or paragraph in isolation”
- explaining that a conviction under 18 U.S.C.S 1027 requires a showing that (1) the defendant made a false statement; (2) knowing it to be false; (3) in a document required by ERISA
- “The negligence of the victim in failing to discover a fraudulent scheme is not a defense to criminal conduct.”
- \The negligence of the victim in failing to discover a fraudulent scheme is not a defense to criminal conduct.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Scirica, Ambrose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.