Skip to main content
· 8/19/1997

United States v. Thomas B. Downs

Citations

  • 123 F.3d 637
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22270
  • 1997 WL 471336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing repayment of loans af ter the fraud is discovered and holding that such payments do not reduce the loss calculation
  • discussing repayment of loans after the fraud is discovered and holding that such payments do not reduce the loss calculation
  • rejecting the argument that the amount of loss calculation should be reduced by post-discovery restitution
  • rejecting the argument that loss calculation should be reduced by post-discovery restitution
  • rejecting the argument that loss calculation should be reduced by post-discovery restitution
  • counsel’s silence provides substantial evidence of competence because counsel is in position to assess defendant’s ability to understand and assist in the proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Manton, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.