Skip to main content
· 4/18/2003

United States v. Winston Dyer

Citations

  • 325 F.3d 464
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7317
  • 2003 WL 1900934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing ruse exception in immigration context, but declining to decide whether to adopt it as facts did not demonstrate ruse
  • reviewing the district court’s denial of a Speedy Trial Act claim
  • INS working with or notifying U.S. Attorney’s office did not support allegation of collusion to trigger Speedy Trial Act
  • “[T]he Speedy Trial Act’s time limit is not triggered by the fact that the INS is conducting a reasonable investigation in order to decide whether the reentrant should be prosecuted or deported without prosecution.”
  • “Even if we were to conclude that the [ruse] exception is a valid one, [the defendant] has not shown that he would be entitled to invoke it under the circumstances of this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth, Fuentes, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.