United States v. Thunder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 15-month upward variance from guidelines-range was reasonable based on defendant’s repeated violations of supervised release
• concluding that a revocation sentence was substantively reasonable in part because the defendant had “repeatedly violated the conditions of his supervised release”
• holding a revocation sentence above the advisory guideline range was not an abuse of discretion
• finding 15-month upward variance from Guidelines range reasonable given defendant’s repeated violations of supervised release
• finding sentence 15 months above Guidelines range reasonable given defendant’s repeated violations of supervised release
• finding 15-month upward variance from Guidelines range reasonable given defendant’s repeated violations of supervised release

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).