Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 7/13/2007

United States v. Gerald Grant

Citations

  • 490 F.3d 627
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16706
  • 2007 WL 2011644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a search warrant based on an officer’s conclusion that a witness’s description of the images met the definition of child pornography under the state statute
  • computer repairman’s statement that he saw child pornography on computer he was fixing was sufficient to establish probable cause
  • computer repairman’s statement that he saw child pornography on computer he was fixing was sufficient to establish probable cause
  • explicitly distin- guishing between the “great deference” due to the judge who issues a warrant and the non-deferential review of the federal district judge’s decision granting or denying a motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Bowman, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Gerald Grant

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.