Eighth Circuit· 7/13/2007
United States v. Gerald Grant
Citations
- 490 F.3d 627
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16706
- 2007 WL 2011644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a search warrant based on an officer’s conclusion that a witness’s description of the images met the definition of child pornography under the state statute
- computer repairman’s statement that he saw child pornography on computer he was fixing was sufficient to establish probable cause
- computer repairman’s statement that he saw child pornography on computer he was fixing was sufficient to establish probable cause
- explicitly distin- guishing between the “great deference” due to the judge who issues a warrant and the non-deferential review of the federal district judge’s decision granting or denying a motion to suppress
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Bowman, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named United States v. Gerald Grant
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.