· 3/6/2006
United States v. Deandra Sue Warford, United States of America v. Phillip Whatley
Citations
- 439 F.3d 836
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5554
- 2006 WL 522210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Booker does not render statutory minimum sentences unconstitutional
- “[T]here is an inherent indicia of reliability in the richness and detail of a first hand observation.” (alteration in original) (internal quotation omitted)
- “A defendant possesses a firearm ‘in connection with’ an offense if the evidence shows that the weapon ‘facilitated or had [the] potential to facilitate’ the drug offense.” (alteration in original)
- “In reviewing a district court’s denial of a motion to suppress, we may consider the applicability of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule before reviewing the existence of probable cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Melloy, Colloton, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.