Skip to main content
· 3/6/2006

United States v. Deandra Sue Warford, United States of America v. Phillip Whatley

Citations

  • 439 F.3d 836
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5554
  • 2006 WL 522210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Booker does not render statutory minimum sentences unconstitutional
  • “[T]here is an inherent indicia of reliability in the richness and detail of a first hand observation.” (alteration in original) (internal quotation omitted)
  • “A defendant possesses a firearm ‘in connection with’ an offense if the evidence shows that the weapon ‘facilitated or had [the] potential to facilitate’ the drug offense.” (alteration in original)
  • “In reviewing a district court’s denial of a motion to suppress, we may consider the applicability of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule before reviewing the existence of probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Colloton, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.