United States v. Hansel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a taxpayer’s transfers to family members were fraudulent transfers where defendants did not carry their burden to show that fair consideration was given
• holding that under section 272 of the Debtor and Creditor Law, the defendant failed to establish transfer was for fair consideration where the defendant claimed that a transfer of 25 shares of stock was in repayment of a debt, but then offered no evidence of the debt.
• because the new complaint sought “to add not just new claims or updated facts[,] but also new parties[,]” along with Rule 15(a), Rules 20(a
• Court allowed amendment when party did not become aware of information until after depositions were taken and defendants would not be prejudiced in any way
• Court allowed amendment when party did not become aware of information until after depositions were taken and defendants would not be prejudiced in any way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).