Skip to main content
· 1/8/2013

United States v. William Cannon

Citations

  • 703 F.3d 407
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 436
  • 2013 WL 68890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between the portions of a car dealership “open for business” and the locked back rooms used as an employee’s residence
  • stating that “the detectives’ prewarrant conduct must have been ‘close enough to the line of validity to make the officers’ belief in the validity of the warrant objectively reasonable’” (emphases added) (quoting United States v. -7- Conner, 127 F.3d 663, 667 (8th Cir. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Beam, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.