· 7/6/2006
United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-Salazar
Citations
- 452 F.3d 1088
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16839
- 2006 WL 1843394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that nothing in two post-Apprendi Supreme Court cases, Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13 (2005), and Dretke v. Haley, 541 U.S. 386 (2004), overrules Almendarez- Torres
- rejecting the defendant’s arguments challenging the “contin- ued validity of Almendarez-Torres”
- rejecting the defendant’s arguments challenging the “contin- ued validity of Almendarez-Torres”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, O'Scannlain, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.