United States v. Labastida-Segura

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the government’s harmless-error argument for placing the court of appeals “in the zone of speculation and conjecture” and concluding “we simply do not know what the district court would have done” had it applied the Guidelines correctly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).