Eleventh Circuit· 4/20/2000
United States v. Futrell
Citations
- 209 F.3d 1286
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7192
- 2000 WL 430041
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding restitution could be based on reasonable estimate of losses when it would be impossible to determine precise amount
- “The district court is not required, nor does it have the discretion, to consider the offender’s ability to pay when ordering restitution under the [Mandatory Victim Restitution Act].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Dubina, Carnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. McNairEleventh Circuit· 2010-05-12· cited 252×
- United States v. MaxwellEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-19· cited 244×
- United States v. WilliamsEleventh Circuit· 2008-05-16· cited 196×
- United States v. Omar Rodriguez-LopezEleventh Circuit· 2004-03-25· cited 165×
- United States v. Dewey M. HamakerEleventh Circuit· 2006-07-14· cited 155×
- United States v. Nivis MartinEleventh Circuit· 2015-09-30· cited 133×
- United States v. SimpsonEleventh Circuit· 2000-09-29· cited 127×
- United States v. Mauricio Javier PucheEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-12· cited 127×
- United States v. Luis Enrique PolarEleventh Circuit· 2004-05-13· cited 121×
- United States v. George R. CavalloEleventh Circuit· 2015-06-22· cited 112×
- United States v. ValladaresEleventh Circuit· 2008-10-09· cited 99×
- United States v. TampasEleventh Circuit· 2007-07-26· cited 98×
- United States v. Jarred Alexander GoldmanEleventh Circuit· 2020-03-25· cited 93×
- United States v. Lineten BelizaireEleventh Circuit· 2014-12-17· cited 90×
- United States v. GushlakSecond Circuit· 2013-08-29· cited 88×
- United States v. GuptaEleventh Circuit· 2009-06-23· cited 81×
- Cheryl Searcy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2018-09-05· cited 76×
- United States v. Jose Miguel CorderoEleventh Circuit· 2021-08-04· cited 62×
- United States v. Nevia Kevin AbrahamEleventh Circuit· 2004-09-30· cited 54×
- Westley Brian Cani v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2003-05-29· cited 49×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SchleiEleventh Circuit· 1997-09-18· cited 287×
- United States v. ChastainEleventh Circuit· 1999-12-30· cited 223×
- United States v. George Terzado-MadrugaEleventh Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 212×
- United States v. Paul J. SavoieFirst Circuit· 1993-02-08· cited 175×
- United States v. Jimmy Lee Nixon, Richard Nixon, Michael Parks, Emmitt Lamar Manns, Henry L. Manns, Michael Keeley, Gerald WellsEleventh Circuit· 1990-12-07· cited 128×
- United States v. DabbsEleventh Circuit· 1998-02-06· cited 83×
- United States v. Marietta Joyce Chappell, Charles Edward Gibson, Robert Nathaniel Mitchem, and Rita Ann ShephardFifth Circuit· 1993-11-01· cited 80×
- United States v. Lee Vernell JacksonEighth Circuit· 1998-08-13· cited 63×
- United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., a Subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a CorporationEleventh Circuit· 1999-11-15· cited 62×
- United States v. Danny Lee TeeheeTenth Circuit· 1990-01-05· cited 52×
- United States v. Nelson Logal, Aarid Dahod, A.K.A. Aarid Mansur Dahodwala, John KuczekEleventh Circuit· 1997-03-06· cited 49×
- United States v. SiegelEleventh Circuit· 1998-09-04· cited 34×
- United States v. ShugartEleventh Circuit· 1999-05-27· cited 27×
- United States v. Wells Fargo Armored Service CorporationFifth Circuit· 1979-01-12· cited 16×
Other cases named United States v. Futrell
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.