Skip to main content
· 5/29/2003

Westley Brian Cani v. United States

Citations

  • 331 F.3d 1210
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10747
  • 2003 WL 21233491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant cannot contest a district court’s initial restitution calculation absent direct appeal
  • construing a district court’s dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction as a denial on the merits, and affirming
  • construing a dismissal as a denial because the district court possessed subject-matter jurisdiction and should have denied the defendant’s motion on the merits
  • construing a dismissal of a motion for lack of jurisdiction as a denial on the merits
  • construing district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction as denial on the merits and affirming because the distinction between denial and dismissal makes no significant difference
  • finding a defedant ion inadequate because supported only by documentation of restitution payments made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Hull, Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.