Skip to main content
· 7/26/1996

United States v. Floyd Bruce

Citations

  • 89 F.3d 886
  • 319 U.S. App. D.C. 245
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18596
  • 1996 WL 415818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the duty of candor applies even if compliance risk disclosure of confidential information and includes the obligation “to avoid making a false statement to the tribunal”
  • describing Rudasill’s conduct in court as “highly problematic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Sentelle, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.