United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert Jubic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the principles underpinning the special needs doctrine “apply a fortiori to federal supervised release”
• holding that probable cause requirements of Fourth Amendment do not apply to a federal probation officer conducting a home visit pursuant to a convicted offender's conditions of supervised release
• concluding that probation officers were not acting as \stalking horses\ for unrelated law-enforcement investigations because \the objectives and duties of probation officers and law enforcement personnel are unavoidably parallel and are frequently intertwined\
• observing that the Griffin rationale “applies] a fortiori” to “federal supervised release, which, in contrast to probation, is ‘meted out in addition to, not in lieu of, incarceration’ ”
• holding that the “probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment do not apply to a federal probation officer conducting a home visit — a far less invasive form of supervision than a search — pursuant to a convicted offender’s conditions of supervised release”
• noting that “ ‘driveways that are readily accessible to visitors are not entitled to the same Fourth Amendment protection as are the interiors of defendants’ houses’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).