United States v. Jackie McCraven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court’s en banc decision in Allen did not “define the minimum requirements for an affidavit based on an informant’s tip”
• “[I]ndependent corroboration of an informant’s story is not necessary to a determination of probable cause[.]”
• “[T]he facts of Allen do not define the minimum requirements for an affidavit based on an informant’s tip”
• “We need not resolve the question [whether the affidavit was sufficient] . . . because . . . the denial of the motion to suppress was proper under the good-faith rule of United States v. Leon . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).