United States v. Faulds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error and affirming convictions for distribution and subsequent possession of same depictions of child pornography
• finding no double jeopardy error based on the defendant’s distribution and possession of child pornography convictions because the jury’s findings were based on separate acts occurring more than a month apart

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Mark Woerner
  Fifth Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 75×
• United States v. Halliday
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-02-14· cited 42×
• United States v. Dudeck
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-07-28· cited 33×
• United States v. Jama Mire
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-07-25· cited 16×
• Faulds v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-07-08· cited 2×
• United States v. Dudeck
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-09-14
• State v. Christensen
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2012-10-16
• Faulds v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-10

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Olano
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Green v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
• Missouri v. Hunter
  Supreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
• Ball v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 1,092×
• Rutledge v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 828×
• United States v. Davenport
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-20· cited 143×
• United States v. Schales
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-10-20· cited 97×
• United States v. Van Allen
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 52×
• United States v. James W. Snyder
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-09-02· cited 46×
• United States v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-04-24· cited 22×
• United States v. Pao Xiong
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-02-08· cited 6×