United States v. Faulds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error and affirming convictions for distribution and subsequent possession of same depictions of child pornography
• finding no double jeopardy error based on the defendant’s distribution and possession of child pornography convictions because the jury’s findings were based on separate acts occurring more than a month apart

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).