United States v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s argument that the district court’s “reliance on facts not found beyond a reasonable doubt” to increase his sentence violated his Fifth Amendment rights because “judicial factfinding does not create a Fifth Amendment problem under Booker”
• waivers of constitutional rights must be knowing and voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).