Tenth Circuit· 4/6/2009

United States v. Erickson

Citations

561 F.3d 1150
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7718
2009 WL 903387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that under Brady, “a defendant is not denied due process by the government’s nondisclosure of evidence if the defendant knew of the evidence anyway.”
explaining that a Brady violation is not established unless the prosecution knew of, and had some measure of possession or control over, evidence allegedly suppressed
stating that § 2255 motions are the preferred vehicle for considering ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
stating the general rule that “ineffective-assistance claims should not be addressed on direct appeal”
declining to consider affidavits referred to only in the reply brief
“[A] defendant is not denied due process by the government’s nondisclosure of evidence if the defendant knew of the evidence anyway.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Hartz, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.