United States v. Eric Holston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “insofar as § 2251(a) prohibits the production of child pornography using materials that have moved in interstate commerce, it is a permissible exercise of Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause.”
• stating that “nexus to interstate commerce is determined by the class of activities regulated by the statute as a whole, not by the simple act for which an individual defendant is convicted” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding Congress’s “prohibit[ion on] the production of child pornography using 6 materials that have moved in interstate commerce” to be “a permissible exercise of Congress’s 7 authority under the Commerce Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).