United States v. Goodale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that hiring and firing “only in the context of quality control, safety, and security” is “qualitatively different” from an employer’s role in hiring and firing
• granting summary judgment to Comcast in joint employer context where court found secondary employer, Comcast, did not exercise sufficient control over employees of the primary employer, the installer
• discussing joint employment for purpose of FLSA, IMWL, and IWPCA claims
• \W & E's apparent dependence on Comcast simply does not translate into functional control by Comcast over W & E technicians.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).