Skip to main content
· 3/15/2006

United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 832
  • 69 Fed. R. Serv. 783
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6216
  • 2006 WL 623595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellant forfeits all issues not raised and argued in initial brief on appeal
  • holding that “the date of commission” of an offense is “so basic as to be implicit in the fact of a prior conviction”
  • holding that ”[a]n appellant abandons all issues not raised and argued in its initial brief on appeal”
  • holding that arguments referred to in a perfunctory manner and unaccompanied by some effort to develop argumentation are deemed waived
  • concluding that an unwitting declarant’s secretly recorded statements made to a friend were not testimonial in nature
  • holding that an unwitting declarant’s secretly recorded statements to a close friend were nontestimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Cook, Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.