United States v. Elbea Malone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the complexity exception where “the calculation [of restitution] involved consideration of two, and only two, things: (1) the property O’Hern lost or its value (which are essentially the same thing when, as here, the property is cash) . . . and (2
• “Courts have decided it is appropriate to place on the defendant the burden of proving that the loss amount should be reduced by compensation re- ceived by the victim from the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).