United States v. Uri Sheinbaum, United States of America v. Marc A. Birnbaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants waived their offset claim, “having failed to present valuation evidence [of any offset] to the district court”
• “[H]aving failed to present valuation evidence to the district court, the defendants waived their ... claim” for credit.
• stating the defendant bore “the burden of proving an offset” to restitution for any amounts it paid the victim in a civil settlement
• “the burden of proving an offset should lie with the defendant” because “the defendant should know the value of any compensation he has already provided to the victim”
• “Logically, the burden of proving an offset should lie with the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).