Skip to main content
· 8/7/2023

United States v. Kelly Isley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sustaining conviction of member of Communist Labor Party, which had adopted resolution advocating violent revolution even though defendant had presented a resolution advocating peaceful means
  • sustaining conviction of member of Communist Labor Party, which had adopted resolution advocating violent revolution even though defendant had presented a resolution advocating peaceful means
  • “although the rights of free speech and assembly are fundamental, they are not in their nature absolute”
  • “[T]he First Amendment permits content discrimination based on the very reasons why the particular class of speech at issue is proscribable.”
  • “[T]he First Amendment permits content discrimination based on the very reasons why the particular class of speech at issue is proscribable.”
  • “[W]here a statute is valid only in case certain conditions exist, the enactment of the statute cannot alone establish the facts which are essential to its validity.” (Brandéis, J., concurring)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.