United States v. Edwin Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that identification testimony wasn’t undermined by a police officer’s failure to admonish a witness that the photos might not have included pictures of the suspect
• collecting examples of where courts have held that witnesses were unconstitutionally coerced
• “[E]ven if the pretrial identification procedure was suggestive and the identification was unreliable, this court must examine the district court’s failure to exclude the identification for harmless error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).