United States v. Carlo Scott Bagley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the automobile exception \the existence of probable cause alone justifies a warrantless search or seizure of a vehicle\
• holding that show-up was not unnecessarily suggestive, although the witness viewed the defendant seated in a police car, handcuffed, and surrounded by officers
• holding that show-up was not unnecessarily suggestive, although the witness viewed the defendant seated in a police car, handcuffed, and surrounded by officers
• holding that show-up was not unnecessarily suggestive, although the witness viewed the defendant seated in a police car, handcuffed, and surrounded by officers
• holding that show-up was not unnecessarily suggestive, although the witness viewed the defendant seated in a police car, handcuffed, and surrounded by officers
• concluding both that the “government may not argue the facts both ways” and that “[a] mere offer of proof [regarding ownership] does not establish the fact of ownership”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).