Skip to main content
· 5/30/1986

United States v. Edward Elbert Wingender

Citations

  • 790 F.2d 802
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] successful due process defense must be predicated on intolerable government conduct which goes beyond that necessary to sustain an entrapment defense.\
  • “[A] successful due process defense must be predicated on intolerable government conduct which goes beyond that necessary to sustain an entrapment defense.”
  • “Of course, there may be occasions when the factual nature of the government’s conduct is not disputed, or, perhaps, is very obvious or straightforward. Then, an appellate court may be able to resolve the appeal without the benefit of findings of fact by the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farris, Pregerson, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.