United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that only defendants to whom the government’s conduct is directed have standing to raise an outrageous government conduct claim
• remanding to district court for further findings of fact relevant to the government’s alleged role in creating criminal activity
• remanding for factfinding to determine whether government conduct was sufficiently outrageous to warrant dismissal
• courts have consistently rejected outrageous conduct challenges when the targeted criminal enterprise was underway before the government agent became involved
• remand not necessary where \factual nature of government's conduct is not disputed\ or is \very obvious or straightforward\
• due process defense must not swallow up the entrapment rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).