United States v. Daniel P. Glecier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that an indictment for racketeering conspiracy needs to identify specific predicate acts
• management of cross examination and amount of detail to which witness is allowed to testify within trial court's wide discretion
• management of cross examination and amount of detail to which witness is allowed to testify within trial court's wide discretion
• indictment for racketeering conspiracy need not identify specific predicate acts to which the defendant allegedly agreed
• \[i]t is proper to look to post-indictment discovery when considering whether a bill of particulars is required\
• “[T]he RICO statute is not unconstitutional despite Justice Scalia’s statements [in H.J.,, Inc.] concerning the pattern requirement... .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).