Skip to main content
· 9/18/1992

United States v. Daniel Clement Jones

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 176
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22745
  • 1992 WL 228863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The government may meet its burden [of proving predisposition] by demonstrating the defendant's ready response to the inducement offered.\
  • “The core issue raised by the entrapment defense is whether the defendant was predisposed to conduct which is criminal, regardless of whether the defendant appreciated its criminality .... ”
  • jury could conclude defendant's statements showed rationalization or posturing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Murnaghan, Niemeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.