· 9/18/1992
United States v. Daniel Clement Jones
Citations
- 976 F.2d 176
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22745
- 1992 WL 228863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The government may meet its burden [of proving predisposition] by demonstrating the defendant's ready response to the inducement offered.\
- “The core issue raised by the entrapment defense is whether the defendant was predisposed to conduct which is criminal, regardless of whether the defendant appreciated its criminality .... ”
- jury could conclude defendant's statements showed rationalization or posturing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phillips, Murnaghan, Niemeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.