United States v. Arch Trading Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that conviction for violating § 1001 requires proof of a false statement that was made willfully and that was “material to a matter within the jurisdiction of the agency”
• stating that conviction for violating § 1001 requires proof of a false statement that was made willfully and that was \material to a matter within the jurisdiction of the agency\
• finding materiality where the defendant falsely stated that it had a license, even though the government’s response was that no license was required
• upholding presidential authority under IEEPA to declare a “national emergency” in the face of threats to “to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States”
• rejecting vagueness challenge to International Economic Emergency Powers Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).