· 8/12/1991
United States v. Douglas Floyd Osborne, Jr.
Citations
- 935 F.2d 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “undercover operations provide a [lawful] means by which participants in the clandestine child pornography industry can be detected”
- holding the government’s mailing of child- pornography material to the defendant in order to issue a search warrant was not outrageous
- upholding conviction of defendant who provided heroin in exchange for sexual favors from woman who had been manipulated into doing so by the FBI
- “[I]f the defendant’s predisposition is established, the defense of entrapment may not be based on government misconduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Wilkinson, Smith, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.