Skip to main content
· 8/12/1991

United States v. Douglas Floyd Osborne, Jr.

Citations

  • 935 F.2d 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “undercover operations provide a [lawful] means by which participants in the clandestine child pornography industry can be detected”
  • holding the government’s mailing of child- pornography material to the defendant in order to issue a search warrant was not outrageous
  • upholding conviction of defendant who provided heroin in exchange for sexual favors from woman who had been manipulated into doing so by the FBI
  • “[I]f the defendant’s predisposition is established, the defense of entrapment may not be based on government misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Wilkinson, Smith, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.