Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fourth Circuit· 4/19/2016

United States v. Shane Hare

Citations

  • 820 F.3d 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding statistical evidence with a “relatively small sample size and weak basis for comparison, is clearly insufficient” to show discriminatory intent
  • observing that proper comparison group for analyzing racial disparities in stash house sting operations would be individuals who would have been \receptive to a stash house robbery scenario\ and who \ATF had the means of infiltrating\
  • noting argument that in a selective enforcement claim, \there are less likely to be records of similarly situated individuals who were never investigated or arrested\
  • explaining that “the court need not reach the merits of this argument . . . [because]” a §924(c) conviction predicated on both conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime is not affected by Johnson.
  • explaining that “the court need not reach the merits of this argument . . . [because]” a §924(c) conviction predicated on both conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime is not affected by Johnson.
  • explaining that “the court need not reach the merits of this argument . . . [because]” a §924(c) conviction predicated on both conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime is not affected by Johnson.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shedd, Floyd, Biggs, Middle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.