Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 11/2/1999

United States v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 194 F.3d 1186
  • 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20202
  • 49 ERC (BNA) 1481
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28401
  • 1999 WL 993106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a $147,716.66 expenditure was substantial, even in the face of the “relative simplicity of the technique” for cleanup
  • affirming the district court's denial of a proposed instruction because it was not submitted in writing
  • affirming the district court's denial of a proposed instruction because it was not submitted in writing
  • affirming the district court’s denial of a proposed instruction because it was not submitted in writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Carnes, Watson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.