United States v. Elio Jesus Arbolaez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant did not satisfying the substantiality requirement for a Franks hearing because he relied on hearsay statements and did not submit affidavits or other sworn statements
• holding that hearsay objection does not preserve a Confrontation Clause challenge
• holding that hearsay objection does not preserve a Confrontation Clause challenge
• holding that hearsay objection does not preserve a Confrontation Clause challenge
• suggesting that Herring error that occurs at the forfeiture stage of a federal criminal trial might be structural or might be subject to the federal constitutional harmless error standard
• explaining that the “constructive denial of counsel is legally presumed to result in prejudice and thus to constitute a structural error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).