Eleventh Circuit· 4/5/2012

United States v. Lebowitz

Citations

676 F.3d 1000
88 Fed. R. Serv. 86
2012 WL 1123845
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a district court does not have to give mitigating factors the weight a defendant contends they deserve
rejecting the defendant’s argument that pornographic pictures were merely incidental to a sexual encounter where the defendant took purposeful steps to facilitate the pictures
finding sufficient evidence that defendant believed K.S. was fifteen years old because internet chats demonstrated that defendant was aware of KS.’s age and “continued to entice” him
“We review de novo a challenge to a statute’s constitutionality.”
defendant discussed with minor videotaping the encounter beforehand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Marcus, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Lebowitz

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.