United States v. Lebowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a district court does not have to give mitigating factors the weight a defendant contends they deserve
• rejecting the defendant’s argument that pornographic pictures were merely incidental to a sexual encounter where the defendant took purposeful steps to facilitate the pictures
• finding sufficient evidence that defendant believed K.S. was fifteen years old because internet chats demonstrated that defendant was aware of KS.’s age and “continued to entice” him
• “We review de novo a challenge to a statute’s constitutionality.”
• defendant discussed with minor videotaping the encounter beforehand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).