Rudd v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Daubert factors are not, the Supreme Court has emphasized, appropriately used as a definitive checklist, but should instead by understood as non-exclusive, nondispos-itive considerations that may shape the trial judge’s ‘flexible inquiry’ under Rule 702.”
• expert testimony should be excluded if it contains internal inconsistencies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).