United States v. Cores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using that test when “there is an absence” in the “statutory offense[ ]” of a “spe- cific provision fixing venue”
• construing similar statute as continuing offense with venue proper in any district visited
• “The Constitution makes it clear that determination of proper venue in a criminal case requires determination of where the crime was committed.”
• \The Constitution makes it clear that determination of proper venue in a criminal case requires determination of where the crime was committed.\
• “The provision for trial in the vicinity of the crime is a safeguard against the unfairness and hardship involved when an accused is prosecuted in a remote place.”
• “The provision for trial in the vicinity of the crime is a safeguard against the unfairness and hardship involved when an accused is prosecuted in a remote place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Cores

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Cores
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-12
• United States v. Cores
  Supreme Court· 1957-12-09