Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/19/1958

United States v. Cores

Citations

  • 356 U.S. 405
  • 78 S. Ct. 875
  • 2 L. Ed. 2d 873
  • 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using that test when “there is an absence” in the “statutory offense[ ]” of a “spe- cific provision fixing venue”
  • construing similar statute as continuing offense with venue proper in any district visited
  • “The Constitution makes it clear that determination of proper venue in a criminal case requires determination of where the crime was committed.”
  • \The Constitution makes it clear that determination of proper venue in a criminal case requires determination of where the crime was committed.\
  • “The provision for trial in the vicinity of the crime is a safeguard against the unfairness and hardship involved when an accused is prosecuted in a remote place.”
  • “The provision for trial in the vicinity of the crime is a safeguard against the unfairness and hardship involved when an accused is prosecuted in a remote place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Douglas, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

156 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Cores

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.