In Re Snow
Citations
- 120 U.S. 274
- 7 S. Ct. 556
- 30 L. Ed. 658
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 1974
Syllabus
<p>Where a District Court in the Territory of Utah refuses to issue a writ of habeas corpus involving the question of personal freedom, an appeal lies tp this court from its order and judgment of refusal.</p> <p>The-offence of cohabiting with more than one woman, created by § 3 of the act of Congress of March 22, 1882, c. 47, 22 Stat. 31, is a continuous offénce, and not one consisting of an isolated act.</p> <p>S. was convicted separately in a District Court of the Territory of Utah, on three indictments under that section, covering together a continuous period of time, each covering a different part, but the three .parts being continuous, the indictments being found at the same time, by the same grand jury, on one oath and one examination, of the same witnesses, covering the whole continuous time. One judgment was-entered on the three convictions. It first imposed a term of imprisonment and a fine. It next imposed two further successive -terms of imprisonment, each to begin at the expiration of the last preceding sentence and judgment, with two further fines. It set forth the time embraced by each indictment and specified each of the three punishments as being imposed in respect of a specified one of the indictments. On a petition to a District Court of the Territory, by the defendant, for a writ-of habeas corpus, setting forth that he had been imprisoned under the judgment for more than the term first imposed, and had paid the fine first imposed, and that the other two punishments were in excess of the authority of the trial court, the writ was refused. On appeal to this court; Held,</p> <p>(1) There was but one entire offence for the continuous time.</p> <p>(2) The trial court had no jurisdiction to inflict a punishment in respect of more than one of the convictions.</p> <p>■ (3) As the want of jurisdiction appeared on the face of the proceedings, ' the defendant could be released from imprisonment on a habeas corpus. (4) The order and judgment of the court belo
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
186 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 1,789×
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-01-11· cited 1,678×
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-11-09· cited 848×
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 657×
- NielsenSupreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 642×
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-12-15· cited 631×
- Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1939-01-30· cited 492×
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 462×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1944-12-18· cited 313×
- Ebeling v. MorganSupreme Court· 1915-06-01· cited 263×
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 263×
- Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-12· cited 259×
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-01-03· cited 242×
- State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court· 2012-03-09· cited 232×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court· 1867-01-22· cited 531×
- Ex Parte BigelowSupreme Court· 1885-02-02· cited 101×
- The LauraSupreme Court· 1885-04-07· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1879-01-18· cited 36×
- State v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court· 1860-06-09· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. ConnorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1874-10-22· cited 16×
- Fisher v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals· 1871-12-12· cited 14×
- Washburn v. M'InroyNew York Supreme Court· 1810-11-15· cited 7×
- Tiffany v. DriggsNew York Supreme Court· 1816-05-15· cited 3×
- United States v. New York Guaranty & Indemnity Co.S.D. New York· 1875-12-15· cited 2×
- United States v. Erie Ry. Co.S.D. New York· 1877-03-15· cited 1×
Other cases named In Re Snow
23 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re SnowE.D. California· 1982-07-13· cited 22×
- In Re SnowD. Massachusetts· 1995-08-16· cited 15×
- In Re SnowE.D. California· 1982-10-28· cited 10×
- In re SnowNinth Circuit· 1945-02-09· cited 4×
- In Re SnowN.D. Oklahoma· 1988-12-20· cited 3×
- In re SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-07-18· cited 3×
- In re SnowOhio Court of Claims· 1996-08-27· cited 2×
- In re SnowSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-01-16· cited 2×
- In re SnowW.D. Oklahoma· 2019-05-09· cited 2×
- In re SnowCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-01-26· cited 2×
- In Re SnowN.D. Illinois· 1983-07-18· cited 1×
- In re SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-10-29· cited 1×
- In re SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-04-23· cited 1×
- In re SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-09-23· cited 1×
- In re SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-12-17
- In re SnowSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-04-30
- In re SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-09-21
- In re SnowFederal Circuit· 2004-04-12
- In re SnowCourt of Claims of Illinois· 1995-12-15
- In re SnowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1855-10-15
- In re SnowS.D. New York· 1842-08-15
- In re SnowD. Massachusetts· 1915-04-02
- In re SnowSupreme Court· 2013-05-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.