Skip to main content
· 8/23/1996

United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.

Citations

  • 937 F. Supp. 943
  • 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1080
  • 20 C.I.T. 1080
  • 18 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2231
  • 1996 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he purpose of this penalty is not just to replace lost levies, but to remedy a wrong.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.