United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant had a “legal obligation pursuant to the statute to file appropriate documentation permitting Customs to properly assess duties and determine whether any other applicable requirement of law is met”
• “The degree of culpability is a relevant factor for the Court in assessing a penalty under section 1592,”
• “The degree of culpability is a relevant factor for the Court in assessing a penalty under section 1592.”
• defendant not prejudiced when it had opportunity to file opposing brief after Government filed motion to strike affirmative defense of statute of limitations
• defendant admitted that it used double and sometimes triple invoicing scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).