· 10/18/2006

United States v. Rockwell Automation Inc.

Citations

462 F. Supp. 2d 1243
30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1552
30 C.I.T. 1552
28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2537
2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where movant has supported its motion as Rule 56 requires, Rule 56(e) requires non-movant to come forward with opposing evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pogue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.