Skip to main content
· 8/30/2006

United States v. Ford Motor Company

Citations

  • 463 F.3d 1286
  • 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1429
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22199
  • 2006 WL 2492934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a determination of gross negligence involves a determination of intent [and] is an issue of fact” renewable under the clear error standard
  • stating that ʺa determination of gross negligence involves a determination of intent [and] is an issue of factʺ reviewable under the clear error standard
  • “An importer is guilty of gross negligence if it behaved willfully, wantonly, or with reckless disregard in its failure to ascertain both the relevant facts and the statutory obligation, or acted with an utter lack of care.”
  • futility is a sufficient ground to deny motion to amend complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Rader, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.