· 12/9/2011
United States v. Clogston
Citations
- 662 F.3d 588
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24440
- 2011 WL 6118533
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that weighing pertinent factors to determine sentence \is largely within the court's informed discretion\
- observing that \the discretion to vary under Kimbrough is not tantamount to an obligation to do so\
- noting that the \weighting\ of the \relevant [sentencing] factors\ is \largely within the court's informed discretion\
- noting that an appellate court \must assay the record as a whole to gauge the sentencing judge's thought process\
- explaining that “the weighting of [sentencing] factors is largely within the court’s informed discretion”
- explaining that \the weighting of [sentencing] factors is largely within the court's informed discretion\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Selya, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.