Skip to main content
· 10/26/1998

United States v. Arlie D. Maggard, United States of America v. Daisy Dawn Maggard, United States of America v. Timothy J. Maggard

Citations

  • 156 F.3d 843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because conspiracy is a continuing offense, application of the Sentencing Guidelines in effect at the time of withdrawal or sentencing is proper
  • discussing cooperating witnesses who testified under plea agreements, and stating, “The jury’s choice to credit the testimony of those witnesses was within its province, and we uphold the conviction if substantial evidence supports it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Gibson, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.