Skip to main content
· 6/26/2009

United States v. Chatfield

Citations

  • 67 M.J. 432
  • 2009 CAAF LEXIS 738
  • 2009 WL 1855831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “there is no per se rule that whenever a suspect appears at a police sta- tion for questioning, the suspect is therefore in custody”
  • finding an interview to be noncustodial when an individual voluntarily went to a po- lice station for questioning not under express orders from a superior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Effron, Baker, Erdmann, Stucky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.