United States v. Carl E. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although no direct evidence of perjury was produced, none was required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Kemp
  Third Circuit· 2007-08-27· cited 210×
• United States v. Michael E. Gaudin
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-06-21· cited 161×
• United States v. Burnell G. Watson
  Seventh Circuit· 1980-06-11· cited 57×
• United States v. Girtha L. Gulley
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-04-22· cited 28×
• United States v. Vilma Allison Olmeda
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-03-14· cited 10×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Glasser v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• MacKey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
• United States v. Mandujano
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 525×
• Bryson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 297×
• United States v. Roy Mandujano
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-10-16· cited 56×
• United States v. Robert F. Devitt
  Seventh Circuit· 1974-07-02· cited 55×
• United States v. Charles G. Nickels
  Seventh Circuit· 1974-11-01· cited 43×
• United States v. Wayne B. Clizer
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-08-31· cited 28×
• United States v. Carl Digiovanni
  Seventh Circuit· 1968-07-15· cited 22×
• In Re Charles Stanley Bonk, a Witness Before the Special March 1974 Grand Jury
  Seventh Circuit· 1975-11-21· cited 17×
• United States v. John Wesson
  Seventh Circuit· 1973-05-24· cited 10×