United States v. Juan G. Rios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's \bare legal ownership\ would not suffice to establish standing absent \any indication that he used the ... home in such a way as to raise a legitimate expectation of privacy\
• holding that defendant’s ‘‘bare legal ownership’’ would not suffice to establish standing absent ‘‘any indication that he used the . . . home in such a way as to raise a legiti- mate expectation of privacy’’
• holding prejudicial error in closing argument in part because prosecutor drew an inference that defendant had threatened the safety of Prosecutor's crucial witnesses when there was no evidence linking the defendant to the threats
• reporting that the prosecutor suggested that the defense counsel conspired to fake exculpatory evidence
• reporting that the prosecutor suggested that the defense counsel conspired to fake exculpatory evidence
• finding that mobile home owner had no expectation of privacy where, despite his ownership of the property, he did not live in it, take normal precautions to maintain privacy in the home, or use the home in such a way as to justify an expectation of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).